Evaluation of 8th grade students’ engagement in literature lessons in secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53468/mifyr.2025.5.4.15Keywords:
Student engagement, Classroom participation, Learning activities, Observation, Performance-based assessmentAbstract
This study aims to examine the level of student engagement in literature classes among eighth-grade students in general education schools. A total of 607 students from Mongolia and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR) participated in the study. Data were collected using questionnaires and classroom observation methods. Survey results indicate that 49.8% of students reported a high level of interest in literature classes, while 27.5% reported a moderate level of interest; however, their actual classroom participation was relatively low. Observation findings revealed that among 314 observed students, 45.9% did not participate in classroom activities at all, 29% responded to teachers’ questions, 9% engaged in classroom discussions, and only 1% participated in cooperative learning activities. The results demonstrate a clear discrepancy between students’ expressed interest in literature as a subject and their actual level of participation in classroom learning activities.
References
Violita, V., & Budiraharjo, M. (2022). Enhancing student engagement and active learning through flipped classroom in literature class. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 10(1), 49-59. doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v10i1.6800
Azizah, A. N., Al Farhan, M., Nadia, H., & Murtiningsih, T. (2024). Students’ Engagement in Reading Through Literature Circle. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education for All, 344–351. Atlantis Press.
doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-226-2_28
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 107–138. doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports of Mongolia. (2019). Basic education curriculum. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Beetham, H. (2007). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing and Delivering E-learning. Routledge Press.
Leontiev, A. N. (1975). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400105
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 97–131. Springer, Boston, MA. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Batzorig, J. (2021). The relationship between engagement and learning activity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Munkhgerel Baatarjav, Bayarmaa Gombo, TAONUOEN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.